Earmark vs Circleback
Circleback automates the follow-up. Earmark ships the work.
Circleback is a polished AI notetaker — clean automatic notes, action items, and automations that fire after the meeting across the tools you already use. Earmark is built for product and engineering teams: it captures botlessly and turns the live conversation into PRDs, Linear and Jira tickets, decision logs, and stakeholder updates before the call ends.
Earmark vs Circleback, side by side
Both capture your meetings. They turn them into different things.
| Capability | Earmark | Circleback |
|---|---|---|
| Primary output | Shippable work: PRDs, tickets, decision logs, updates | AI notes, action items & post-meeting automations |
| Works without a bot joining your call | Yes | Bot joins video calls |
| Builds the work in real time during the meeting | Yes | Notes & automations fire after the meeting |
| Drafts PRDs, specs & acceptance criteria | Yes | No |
| Creates Jira / Linear tickets | Built-in, in real time | Via automations / integrations |
| Post-meeting automations & workflow triggers | Auto-delivers deliverables | Yes |
| Multi-language transcription (60+ languages) | Core languages | Yes |
| Purpose-built for product & engineering teams | Yes | General-purpose notetaker |
| Hands deliverables to local coding agents | One-click to Claude Code, Cursor, Codex | No |
| Starting price | Starter: $8/month | $25 / seat / month |
Reviewed August 28, 2026 using the first-party sources below. Circleback is a trademark of its respective owner and is not affiliated with Earmark.
Why product teams pick Earmark
The work, not just the workflow
Circleback is excellent at capturing the meeting and firing automations afterward — push action items to Notion, create a CRM record, send a Slack recap. But you still author the PRD, the tickets, and the spec. Earmark generates those artifacts themselves, in the formats product and engineering teams ship with.
Real time, not after the call
Circleback's notes and automations run once the meeting ends. Earmark builds the deliverables live during the conversation — so you leave the call with a drafted PRD and a set of Linear tickets already waiting, not a queue of automations to review.
Botless capture, by default
Circleback joins video calls as a bot. Earmark captures device-side with no bot in the participant list, and works across Zoom, Meet, Teams, and in person — at $8/month rather than $25/seat.
Hand the work straight to your local agents
Earmark doesn’t stop at the artifact. Every PRD, ticket spec, and decision log saves as local markdown your coding agents read instantly — and one click from any artifact kicks off your agent on the spot. No other meeting tool does this.
Saved as local markdown
Deliverables are written to your machine as clean markdown — the format Claude Code, Cursor, and Codex read natively. No export step, no copy-paste, no lock-in.
One-click agent actions
Launch a local agent directly from any Earmark artifact. The spec becomes a working coding session in one click, while the meeting context is still fresh.
Trusted by product teams who ship through conversation
“Earmark transforms planning calls straight into PRDs and JIRA tickets. An indispensable PM tool that saves hours of documentation.”
“No other AI transcription tool gives this level of flexibility. Cuts my admin time by about 75%.”
“Earmark is far beyond a basic meeting tool — task agents build summaries, follow-ups, and deliverables while we’re still talking.”
Questions?
What is the difference between Earmark and Circleback?
Earmark turns live meetings into shippable product and engineering work — PRDs, Linear and Jira tickets, decision logs — using botless device-side capture in real time. Circleback is a general-purpose AI notetaker focused on polished automatic notes, action items, and post-meeting automations, recorded via a bot that joins the call.
Is Earmark cheaper than Circleback?
Yes. Circleback starts around $25 per seat per month. Earmark starts at $8/month and does not meter core deliverables behind add-ons.
Does Earmark join my meetings like Circleback?
No. Earmark captures device-side, so no bot appears in the participant list, and it works across Zoom, Meet, Teams, and in person. Circleback joins video calls with a bot.
Can Earmark replace Circleback?
Earmark replaces Circleback for product and engineering teams whose main need is meeting-driven deliverables generated in real time. Teams who mainly want polished automated notes and flexible post-meeting automations across many apps may still prefer Circleback.
Who should use Circleback instead of Earmark?
Teams that primarily need clean automatic notes, broad multi-language transcription, and configurable automations that push action items into many third-party tools after the meeting should consider Circleback.
Leave your next meeting with the work already done.
Circleback automates the busywork after the call. When you need the meeting to become shippable work for your product team — in real time — switch to Earmark. Start free, no bot, no credit card.
Start free